Hi
I refer to "Peace Lovers" letter of 17 February 2010.
Perhaps Peace Lover has not had the opportunity to view some of the proof the Farrar's have regarding the problem with stand 324. They really should hear more and will find it most interesting as we did. Admittedly, we thought all this was unnecessary but out of frustration we understand their reasoning.
And so by the way - they are very neighbourly. Perhaps the owner of stand 324 is not “neighbourly” otherwise he would have followed the guidelines. I really love Mr & Mrs XYZ comparison they made about the aircraft carrier. Best one I’ve heard in a long time.
I wonder if the security incident everybody talks about (near old crusher site) happened to "King Rann" - nobody wants to give any details but I see he has two huge search lights permanently on at night.
I saw today for the first time a guard with a dog. I think this is brilliant idea as I saw on the official website that the security incidents are thought to be inside jobs.
Cheers
Blou Bulle
Friday, March 12, 2010
Expose board members that don't get the job done
Hi everybody
I refer to Mr & Mrs XYZ's mail.
Myself and a few other people I know, have this feeling that the board members seems more like one big happy family instead. I think that some of them let their feelings run the show instead of facts. The whole board when presented with the facts regarding stand 324 should have sought clarity and accountability and sorted this problem out way back last year?
Obviously there were board decisions made here by some of them without due process or in fact informing others on the board. My guess they all stick together and protect the ones who may have made a poor decision. I agree with Mr & Mrs XYZ that all home owner members should know who these board members were. The board, although not elected correctly in my opinion, for reasons best known to the chairman, have to have a more responsible approach.
I know and acknowledge that board members do this job for no re-numeration. They were elected by all of us and the least we expect is that they will leave their personal agendas in the cupboard when they go to board meetings and concentrate solely on the facts presented to them and on the prevailing problems. If there was a problem with the building committee's decision made regarding stand 324, then the remainder of the board member should have insisted that the issue be resolved once and for all and to the book without the building committee present. This is what a lot of companies do when there is an incident like this and for a good reason. I don't think this happened in this case but I may be wrong? I also don't think our board members follow the nameless "paper vote" procedure were-by all votes are anonymous.
I know 3 or 4 of our board members and I will back them as being conscientious and good people. Some of the others may be letting the whole team down. It would be unkind and incorrect to paint the entire board with the same brush. In no way do I imply that the Farrar’s have done this.
Looking at proceedings at last year AGM, I think there are a few “big dog” egos’ all wanting us believe in their bark.
Goodbye
Snorrebaard
I refer to Mr & Mrs XYZ's mail.
Myself and a few other people I know, have this feeling that the board members seems more like one big happy family instead. I think that some of them let their feelings run the show instead of facts. The whole board when presented with the facts regarding stand 324 should have sought clarity and accountability and sorted this problem out way back last year?
Obviously there were board decisions made here by some of them without due process or in fact informing others on the board. My guess they all stick together and protect the ones who may have made a poor decision. I agree with Mr & Mrs XYZ that all home owner members should know who these board members were. The board, although not elected correctly in my opinion, for reasons best known to the chairman, have to have a more responsible approach.
I know and acknowledge that board members do this job for no re-numeration. They were elected by all of us and the least we expect is that they will leave their personal agendas in the cupboard when they go to board meetings and concentrate solely on the facts presented to them and on the prevailing problems. If there was a problem with the building committee's decision made regarding stand 324, then the remainder of the board member should have insisted that the issue be resolved once and for all and to the book without the building committee present. This is what a lot of companies do when there is an incident like this and for a good reason. I don't think this happened in this case but I may be wrong? I also don't think our board members follow the nameless "paper vote" procedure were-by all votes are anonymous.
I know 3 or 4 of our board members and I will back them as being conscientious and good people. Some of the others may be letting the whole team down. It would be unkind and incorrect to paint the entire board with the same brush. In no way do I imply that the Farrar’s have done this.
Looking at proceedings at last year AGM, I think there are a few “big dog” egos’ all wanting us believe in their bark.
Goodbye
Snorrebaard
Bending of rules
Hello
I refer to Spiro and Jakes previous mails.
I agree totally with Spiro regarding the owner that was allowed to throw his concrete slab until 10H00 at night. At one stage these workers sat around for about 50 minutes (in darkness) as the lights they were using were turned of while they were waiting for the next cement truck to arrive. This is total nonsense and unsafe for the rest of us!! Also these trucks keep on setting of my security alarm.
Jake, I assume is a board member? If you want to improve security let's go back to the old days. We were told under no circumstances will anybody be allowed to work on their houses or properties with a crew during week ends and holidays or in fact after hours. Why is this rule not in force any more? No wonder there are more security incidents .
Chow
Gringo
I refer to Spiro and Jakes previous mails.
I agree totally with Spiro regarding the owner that was allowed to throw his concrete slab until 10H00 at night. At one stage these workers sat around for about 50 minutes (in darkness) as the lights they were using were turned of while they were waiting for the next cement truck to arrive. This is total nonsense and unsafe for the rest of us!! Also these trucks keep on setting of my security alarm.
Jake, I assume is a board member? If you want to improve security let's go back to the old days. We were told under no circumstances will anybody be allowed to work on their houses or properties with a crew during week ends and holidays or in fact after hours. Why is this rule not in force any more? No wonder there are more security incidents .
Chow
Gringo
Why are cement trucks allowed in at 9H00 at night - yet again and again?
Hi
On Wednesday night 10 March 2010, the main gate let in quite a few cement trucks after 6H00. As the site to which these trucks were delivering was up past our house, I got in my car at 9H00 to see what was going on. At the top of Lourie street there were about 14 men still busy working with this house. On my way to the gate I passed another truck on it's way up and after enquiring at the security at the main gate as to who gave permission to this and how many more trucks are going to be allowed in, the answer was that Deon Oosthuizen gave permission and that there was still another 3 trucks on their way. This is not the only incident of this kind and what Spiro is talking about (casting slab on 10H00 at night) is also true as it was the property next door to mine.
I know that you can't stop casting once you started, but we were told that you have to plan it that the last truck is in at 5H00 otherwise you must reschedule for another day. If all of us could cast our slabs in normal working hours, I don't see what is wrong with these building operations. Talk about friends in high places.
Please can any one tell me where I can find the guidelines which are only applicable to these privileged few because I am very sure I must have been given the wrong book.
Come on please! - make your minds up - we all live here!!
Rynette Farrar
On Wednesday night 10 March 2010, the main gate let in quite a few cement trucks after 6H00. As the site to which these trucks were delivering was up past our house, I got in my car at 9H00 to see what was going on. At the top of Lourie street there were about 14 men still busy working with this house. On my way to the gate I passed another truck on it's way up and after enquiring at the security at the main gate as to who gave permission to this and how many more trucks are going to be allowed in, the answer was that Deon Oosthuizen gave permission and that there was still another 3 trucks on their way. This is not the only incident of this kind and what Spiro is talking about (casting slab on 10H00 at night) is also true as it was the property next door to mine.
I know that you can't stop casting once you started, but we were told that you have to plan it that the last truck is in at 5H00 otherwise you must reschedule for another day. If all of us could cast our slabs in normal working hours, I don't see what is wrong with these building operations. Talk about friends in high places.
Please can any one tell me where I can find the guidelines which are only applicable to these privileged few because I am very sure I must have been given the wrong book.
Come on please! - make your minds up - we all live here!!
Rynette Farrar
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
